Talk:Harold & Kumar

Merge
I think the two character articles should be merged here, both the info within the article is basically the same and there isn't anything the really makes them noteworthy enough to stand on their own --- Paulley (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In favor of merge. 70.64.78.207 (talk) 01:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * My honest thoughts, why waste time worrying about it? They are two separate films with two separate plots. Just leave them as is. They're just silly movies for fun and honestly, if someone spends too much time out of their day concerned about articles such as these, then IMHO, they should perhaps re-evaluate some priorities. There are more pressing things/articles to worry about on Wikipedia.Summersky77 (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, it should just be merged. There's really no reason why not. Haroldandkumar12 (talk) 03:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll offer to merge it, but I'll remove the infoboxes and summarize the detail into prose for the respective character sections, then make necessary redirects and edits to the categories/templates.DDDtriple3 (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done, I hope what I did is satisfactory. DDDtriple3 (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Removed sentence
Both his parents speak regular American English, indicating that his family has probably spent a few generations in the U.S.

This is blatant speculation and untrue besides. ¿SFGi Д nts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 02:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Contradiction
As for the future of the series with Penn as lead actor, the section should be cleared up or at least state that is not decided or clear if Penn will return. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.75.44.71 (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Good quote
I read somewhere that the creators plan to create up to 18 Harold & Kumar movies, making a star wars reference. Anyone got that article? Would look good on the page. PIPOCO (talk) 14:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Animated Series hosted by Adult Swim
Here are the sources if you'd like to include it... source 1 source 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:780:234:490D:C67B:6A05:566D (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Split suggestion
I think we should split the character section to its own article. Thoughts? SecondLooneyaccount (talk)
 * I would strongly oppose that given the near-total lack of sourcing in that section and my suspicion that most if not all of the characters have not received significant attention from third-party sources. Can you provide your rationale for feeling we should do a split? DonIago (talk) 21:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)