Talk:Harold L. George/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no real urgency, despite what the boilerplate says. God knows I'm not getting a whole lot of my own stuff done this month. But I will formally put it on hold if you need more time after the first of the year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no real urgency, despite what the boilerplate says. God knows I'm not getting a whole lot of my own stuff done this month. But I will formally put it on hold if you need more time after the first of the year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no real urgency, despite what the boilerplate says. God knows I'm not getting a whole lot of my own stuff done this month. But I will formally put it on hold if you need more time after the first of the year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no real urgency, despite what the boilerplate says. God knows I'm not getting a whole lot of my own stuff done this month. But I will formally put it on hold if you need more time after the first of the year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

<=Lede has been expanded, with ranks taken out. More to follow. Binksternet (talk) 03:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Lede looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the questions about sources are all cleared up. I have found a very small bit of information about the name of the wife and the fact of four children surviving him. Are we there yet? Binksternet (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just about. Add the location of death to the infobox and we'll be done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, infobox now has place of death. Binksternet (talk) 00:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)