Talk:Harris Park Transport

Route table
The table and of routes post Harris Park Transport's demise is not required. It is already covered in the prose.

The article should be about events during HPT's tenure and the immediate transition period thereafter, not unrelated events years later. The history of routes is fancruft. If it needs to be covered, should be done on the Bus routes in Sydney article. Mo7838 (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the table of routes is required since 1. They were not mentioned in any Wikipedia article. 2. They also provide information about the current status of the route. 3. They summarise the prose in table form.Marcnut1996 (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Just because it isn't mentioned doesn't mean it is required. It is fancruft. If they need to be mentioned, and it is debatable if within the scope of Wikipedia, then the Bus routes in Sydney article would be a more appropriate place.
 * 2) The article is about HPT and should solely be about events from 1931 until its cessation in December 2004 and the immediate handover period that followed, not what happened to its former products in 2007, 2010 etc.
 * 3) The routes are already listed, the table is just duplicating the same info in a padded out format. Mo7838 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)