Talk:Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 21:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I'll be looking after this GA review. It looks pretty good I'm pretty sure it will pass. I'll leave a ping once I notice any issues.Tintor2 (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Per wp:lead I recommend expanding a bit the second paragraph at least with general information about the reception due to how much it covers. Just one sentence would be enough
 * Added Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I would recommend adding a nonfree image to make the gameplay easier to expand. If there are size issues, I would suggest merging the two sections.
 * Added Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Is the plot complete or the game was discontiued? It looks like it ended in a cliffhanger. Then again, I've no knowledge of the game. If that's how it ends I would add that "the narrative/game ends with"
 * Episodic release, but it's one of those things where they add bits and pieces all the time. I haven't played it for a while, so I don't know if there is a specific end point, nor if this is fully up to date Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Reference 8 further expands on the developer's intentions which seems quite useful to why all the actor are there.
 * The last paragraph from reception could use a contrasting introduction like. "Despite negative reviews, the game attracted awards"

Other than that, I found no other issues with the article. Revise this and I'll gladly pass it.Tintor2 (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 * 1.Well written:
 * 2.Verifiable with no original research:
 * 3. Broad in its coverage:
 * 4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
 * 5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Good job. Pass.Tintor2 (talk) 23:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)