Talk:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (PC video game)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. -- Vacant 0 (talk &bull; contribs) 21:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 13.8% in similarity.
 * There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
 * The article is stable.
 * No previous GA reviews.

General comments

 * Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
 * No issues were found in the lede.
 * The rest of the article looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
 * Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
 * Add alt texts to the two images that are in the article.
 * I feel like the lede could be slightly expanded with content from the "Development and release" section. The article meets the rest of the MOS:LEDE guideline.
 * The article complies with the MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:WTW, and MOS:WAF guidelines. There are no embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:EMBED.
 * Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
 * References section with a reflist template is present in the article.
 * No referencing issues.
 * Listed references are reliable, most are new websites. I recommend archiving the rest of the unarchived references.
 * Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 23, 26–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
 * Westlake Interactive developing the macOS version is unsourced.
 * Copyvio already checked.
 * Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
 * The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
 * The Reception is well done.
 * The article stays on the topic.
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
 * Checking images.
 * Looks good. Images are uploaded under a non-free licence.

Final comments
There are minor issues to fix. Once they get addressed, I'll promote the article to GA. I'll put the article on hold for a week. -- Vacant 0 (talk &bull; contribs) 22:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks good now. Promoting. Vacant 0  (talk &bull; contribs) 10:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)