Talk:Hartmut Pilch

PEGIDA support
Unlike a previous libelous insertion, this one is not untrue, but still it questionable whether it belongs on the page. The public support for protest against humanitarian migration policies has not reached a level of relevance sufficient for an entry in Wikipedia. Not even in Munich or Germany and much less so in the english-speaking sphere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:62:4836:FC0:C5FE:B40F:1424:30D6 (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Removed passage
The meaning of  Debate within the FFII had become somewhat personal  and these changes probably signify that the FFII has "grown up" as an organisation.

is either unclear or non-NPOV editorialising; I'm not sure which, but, either way, I have edited it out.&mdash;Nat Krause(Talk!) 21:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Why?
Why does this person have a Wikipedia page. 2604:CA00:11C:CE3:0:0:265:DF76 (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * As founder of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure which is a major lobbying organisation with at least one personal link (Christian Engström) to the Pirate Party in Sweden. Wikipedia too stands for free information. VampaVampa (talk) 03:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)