Talk:Harvard Business School/Archives/2013

Crap
This article is, to be blunt, crappy. I rated it a 'start'. For such an important article, it is filled with spam, vandalism, advertising, chicanery, and puffery, yet lacking essential citations. It really needs a cleanup. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You're correct. Removed most of the SPS, copyvio promotional crap.Notabede (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)