Talk:Harvey Proctor

removals
I have removed material from that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 12:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

What is the point of an article that ignores the widely documnted scandal that ended Procter's Parliamentary career? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.111.46 (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Is the BBC story not enough documentation for you? The event in question, you must note, is not any gay sex which may or may not have occurred; the event in question is the scandal, fueled by rumors of gay sex, which brought down Proctor's career. I couldn't care less who Procter slept with, but it's absolutely inarguable that the scandal occurred and that it is noteworthy, probably the most noteworthy event of Proctor's life.

Religion
What religion is Harvey Proctor (or his parents)?, if any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betathetapi545 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Is his religion relevant? Tarquin Q. Zanzibar (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Relevant to what? It seems that you are referring to the recent scandal in the news, although I don't know why. In any event, most biographies include a person's religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.73.162 (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Nothing to do with scandal I was simply responding to the previous commentTarquin Q. Zanzibar (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)