Talk:Harvey Spencer Stephens

Details of attack
At this diff an IP has removed well-referenced details of the subject's crime and conviction, suggesting that they justify only one more sentence in the article. What sentence do you suggest, and what details would you leave out and why? Richard Keatinge (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I note that another editor has reinstated the details. Possibly, indeed, more details than are ideal for an encyclopaedic article. I propose to trim them. A bit. Richard Keatinge (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Skeleton infobox removal
Skeleton infobox rv as per WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia's reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Quis separabit?  03:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)