Talk:Hasib Hussain

Burial
the article says that he is buried in an islamic cemetary.

Does islam have no prohibition about burying suicide victims in holy land/cemetaries?

that seems odd to me. LouiseCooke

Random questions
Who is this Ryan guy, and why is he relevant?

What is a "chargehand"? Would that be the same as a foreman in the USA? Too Old 22:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Yes! --PopUpPirate 02:08, July 15, 2005 (UTC)


 * PopUpPirate, Too Old, I've moved your comments into the "Random Questions" section in order to improve readability of the Talk page. Feel free to change the heading. DiggyG 02:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Can I believe any of this?
there are no sources quoted at all here. anybody could have written this - how about quoting sources next time something gets added?

also the statement that he "had a troubled adolescence" is just too flimsy, as it stands this trouble could mean that he was bothered with acne or that he had gender issues. seems to me that it has been included to support his assumed guilt which so far rests entirely on a police statement (remember the birmingham five, the guildford six etc.). it is a good thing that this poor boy is referenced but lets not get carried away. - DavidP 02:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

It's a new article so give it time. Most of the stuff can be referenced off the BBC. Maybe he needs a "current event" tag? btw - poor boy? what about the poor victims? --PopUpPirate 02:29, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

wat about a ticket issued from king cross station on 7-7-2005.with some body who is still alive.hahaha.the time on the ticket is 925. 58.65.200.87 16:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Well it seems logical
You have a point what seems logical and what the truth is are not necessarily the same. If we had sources that would help but them again it is a work in progress. I'm sure it will be updated

Thought to have died?
"He is thought to have died in the incident, but this has not been confirmed."

"Additionally, the remnants of Hussain’s head [...] were found in the wreckage of the No 30"

Generally, when the remnants of someone's head are found, that person's death has been confirmed. Which of the two statements is true?

They found remnants of his head. How could they know these were remnants of his head so quickly? Surely DNA testing etc would have to be carried out - a lengthy process. Smell a rat right there.
 * What training do you have in DNA testing?  What is your background in DNA testing?   How many DNA tests have you performed?   Probably none.   And yet you'd gladly waste everyone's time with your idiotic conspiracy theories.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Image of Ryan
I think User:Jonathan ryan keeps adding an image of himself to this article. Smells like vanity to me. In any event, the image of "a recent convert to islam" who briefly met with Hussain is hardly notable and doesn't belong in the article. ~k 04:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Merger with 7 Colenso Mount
The flat that Hussain lived in does not need its own wiki article. I've merged the 7 Colenso Mount material into this article, and edited it down a little bit. However I do not know what to make of the 2 images that were unique to the 7 Colenso Mount. Perhaps someone who knows more about London, and the 7/7 bombings can decide what to do with them. Cheers. DiggyG 02:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I've re-redirected the content fork 7 Colenso Mount. There have been no news stories focused primarily on this particular house. It only gets mentioned in relation to it's infamous former inhabitant. It is otherwise not notable, and the article was only duplicating material already on the Hasib Hussain page. Someone added some references to that article which might be useful in this article, I will leave them here, on the talk page for eventual integration into this article.



DiggyG (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hussaincctv.jpg
Image:Hussaincctv.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)