Talk:Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Looking at this one. —Ed!(talk) 00:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * The lead sections should be expanded to give a concise summary of the whole article. See WP:LEAD for a bit more on this.
 * "came in sizes up to seven and a half feet wide by fifty feet long." -- use the undefined undefined template for our friends on the metric system if you could.
 * Any idea who the original founders of the Haskelite company was, or who provided the capital for it? I see some names in the infobox that should be discussed.
 * "The plant was located on 107 acres of land near the Fuller Station." -- again, convert template here.
 * How much did the facility cost?
 * Convert 50 mph, I think knots would be preferred for a seaborne vehicle.
 * Some of the Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation references can be shortened, to the company or the factory or something like that.
 * 1) Any numbers on revenue, volume produced or number of employees? Again seeing an employee number in the infobox but not a date or anything like that.
 * 2) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Seeing plenty of refs.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass no problems.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * All images look appropriately tagged for copyright.
 * 1) Other:
 * Dup links, external links, copyvio and dup links tools all look good.
 * ''Source spotcheck Refs 6, 16, 30 all match up to what's cited in the article.


 * On hold pending some improvements. —Ed!(talk) 01:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe I have answered all the issues you brought up. Can you look it over. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your work on this one! Passing GA. —Ed!(talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)