Talk:Hassan Pakravan

Corpse Mugshot
Along with wikifying the whole page, I also added an external link with a POV article on Pakravan. The website contains a picture taken by the Revolutionary Guard of Pakravan after his execution. It is graphic but I think is also essential in that people understand the impact of this, just as is pictures of genocide be recorded by history. If any of you find this to be un-necessary, please let me know. Unreal128 02:04, 26 July 2006.


 * this is not necessary. knowing of his execution is enough..pictures are not necessary. thanks.


 * Please give me your line of logic on this one. Shouldn't the reader be allowed to view all sources necessary? I agree that it isn't necessary to have it on the page itself, but I think it should be allowed in the external links. Do you think that it will bias the reader too much and to what degree? Please let me know your thoughts and don't remove it until we fully discuss this. I may agree with you but I need to understand why. Unreal128 16:09, 29 April 2007.

NPOV
This page needs some serious updating. It is essentially a fluff piece for this mass murderer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.127.39 (talk • contribs)

I agree, where is the source to back up the claims with regards to the relationship with Khomeini and his role in diffusing the situation between the Shah and Shariatmadari? This is all rubbish... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 21:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)