Talk:Hate-watching

Unsigned comment

 * Jezebel!?!? (comment by 85.241.44.149)

Notability

 * WP:NEO reads: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." If we are to keep this article, that sort of source needs to exist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Suggest redirect to Wictionary. as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you think there is an issue with the article, the best course of action is to take it to AFD, where it will spark a conversation with the larger community, and even inspire improvements to the article along the way.--Coin945 (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * As per Deletion is not cleanup, and on the assumption that users reading a page are often interested in/knowledgeable regarding a topic, I prefer to tag articles for sourcing, notability before rusing to AFD in the hope that someone will be inspired to expand, source in a way that meets WP:NEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." If we are to keep this article, that sort of source needs to exist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age
— Assignment last updated by Vane852 (talk) 08:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

List of hate-watching shows not neutral?
Creating a list of shows that are commonly hate-watched does not represent a neutral point of view and has little relevance to the article. WriterArtistCoder (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)