Talk:Hatim al-Tai

Merging the Two Articles
Dear Malaiya ji !

I thank you once again for your suggestions and valuable contributions to the Wikipedia articles.I fully agree with your suggestion to merge the two exsisting Wikipedia articles on the same subject.It would be most appropriate to merge the article Hatem at-Ta'i into Hatimtai.The former is a stub with only a few references, while the later one,thanks to you,is more elaborate and more informative.Moreover, you had made it much-improved,authentic and reliable by various citations. Hatimtai ia now a quality article of high significance on the concerned subject.

Sir, I appreciate the important edits that you have been doing.Please, continue it. Millions of readers around the world are getting the benefit of free and authentic information from Wikipedia.Outstanding contributions by logical persons and intellectuals,like you,make Wikipedia a reliable and important source of information ! Once again,thanks a lot !

(Otttdq (talk) 01:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC))

Thank you. I am merging the two articles.--Malaiya (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Moved from the merged article
The photo you were looking for has been deleted

Picture of his tomb?
A photo of his tomb was perhaps at

http://www.flickr.com/photos/48654904@N00/323636787/

unfortunately it is no longer there.

The link in the text does not work.

It is not there anymore. If someone would find another photo, it would be very interesting. His tomb is specifically mentioned in the Arabian knights.

--Malaiya (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Dear Malaiya ji !

Thank you for merging  the two articles with perfection.You have done it very carefully and properly.Now it's just one authentic,elaborate and quality Wikipedia article.You have been doing a great historical research work, Malaiya ji ! Thanks a lot !

Otttdq (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)