Talk:Hawk MM-1

July 2018
Besides about 3-4 photos online absolutely nothing exists on this gun, why! WHY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.170.143 (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * There's some stuff out there;, , & . Field & Stream had a movie Q&A about it, and there's even a couple of them for sale on Gunbroker and Armslist. Certainly more info than a couple of IMDb cites. Perhaps even enough to stave of deletion... - the WOLF  child  23:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Delete?
Should the page be deleted? The only source listed is another site with no sources. There has never been a single case of the MM-1 being used by any military ever. "HawkEngineering Co" makes RVs and "Special Forces of USA" is not a thing. There's no pictures of it in use, no ex-SF guy has ever mentioned it, nothing.

I have an email out to a Hawk Industries that owns a patent done by Rogark, but I don't expect to get anything. There is one source for the MM-1 ever existing, and that is the single example used in a few movies.--MandolinMagi (talk) 02:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No, because it's clearly WP:NOTABLE. However (and your enquiries would be most useful) it might need reworking as a fictional weapon.
 * BTW - is this the same weapon which appeared, much earlier, in The Dogs of War (film, if not book)? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Also, what's that sight tube above the barrel? No way is that useful for any sort of grenade launcher! I'm inclining more and more to the "purely fictional" Andy Dingley (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Is that a "sight tube"? Or part of the frame? Below is just clearance space for the magazine to rotate. Just an observation. - Coyote-head.svg wolf 21:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * See my post above for more refs. FYI - the WOLF  child  23:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)