Talk:Hawthorne Tree

Appearance
I would highly recommend a couple of changes to be made to your article. First of all, the article's title is slightly misleading. I feel that if you are going to talk about the medicinal qualities of the Hawthorne Tree then that that should be stated from the get-go. If this is the way you wish to go, then I would recommend links to sites that have more specific recipies and such. I did a quick search for the Hawthorn Tree and many sites that I looked at also included folk names and myths that surround the tree. Maybe you could talk about those too if you are taking the more home-remedy stance.

If however, you do wish to talk about the plant itself, I would recommend that you would add more information -taxonomy, pictures, plant type, flower, leaf and fruit classifications. You might even include how the plant attracts certain pollinators.

Whichever route you choose to take this article, (or possibly a mixture of the two) I might suggest some more general things. You might want to make your article more like other wiki articles - headings and pictures. [The questions at the beginning of each section should be more apparent}. Also, you should add your sources at the bottom or at least links for where you could find more information for those interested.

--Massonika 06:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I enjoyed your article, but after some more research I found that there are several different kinds of hawthorne trees, you may want to talk about those some and be able to tell where each of them comes from and what their parts are used for. http://www.gardenguides.com/herbs/hawthorne.htm I also found that these trees can be up to 400 years old, that's pretty interesting you should probably mention that too. I think you have a very good start, I think you could use a little more detail and some pictures.

Deadend
It is no longer a deadend page. -- &#8734;Dbroadwell 01:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)