Talk:Hayel Saeed Anam Group

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hayel Saeed Anam Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202225544/http://www.alyemany.com/~hsatest/en/company_contact.php?codecpy=53&cpytype=3 to http://www.alyemany.com/~hsatest/en/company_contact.php?codecpy=53&cpytype=3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003433/http://www.hsagroup.com/en/founder.php to http://www.hsagroup.com/en/founder.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Criticism tab
I have found an article on The Telegraph about the practices of HSA Group in Indonesia, which have been widely criticised. I explained the arguments and referenced the article, as HSA Group has not responded to the allegations, I have also mentioned that. Why has my edit been reverted twice? Here's what I wanted to add to the article:

Criticism In 2018, Greenpeace and Aidenvironment claimed to have documented large scale deforestation in areas, which have been given an extra level of protection of deforestation and are controlled by subsidiaries of the Hayel Saeed Anam Group (Arma Foods and Pacific Oils and Fats). Following these accusations, Unilever suspended placement of any new orders from HSA's Group subsidiaries until the allegations have been satisfactorily addressed by them. The HSA Group has not responded to request for comment by The Daily Telegraph. Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/04/26/greenpeace-investigation-claims-palm-oil-supplier-major-brands/

Please let me know the reasons for the revert.

0berbabo1 (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


 * On reasons for the revert I can only speculate, but WP:DUCK does seem to apply. Just on the off-chance that there is a conflict of interest at work, I have placed an appropriate welcome on the relevant single-issue editor's talk page. Meanwhile I have substituted your text for the vacuous and unreferenced PR stuff previously calling itself an "overview". I'll also keep this page on my watch list for a bit. Sylvia de Jonge (talk) 11:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)