Talk:Hazel Rymer

WP:NOR violation
This article is almost exclusively based on primary sources. Of the 22 cited sources, at most two are secondary sources (not sure about this, otherwise it's just one, and even that is just a rehashed interview). That violates the WP:PRIMARY part of WP:No original research. To make matters worse, some of those primary sources are misinterpreted or misrepresented, and since primary sources shouldn't be interpreted at all, that introduces not just dubious statements of fact but also violates WP:NOR. Pinging who wrote this. Huon (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)