Talk:HeadBlade

Article cleanup
This looks like pure spam. If it wasn't for the uncollaborated claim of being listed by Time magazine, I'd PROD it as unnotable. As it is, just just reads like an advert. Requires cleaning up. -- Tivedshambo (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Much improved now. However, Barryfein has asked me about removing the advert tag (I see he's done this), so I've requested peer review for an outside opinion. See User talk:Tivedshambo -- Tivedshambo (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I see that the peer review was archived, so perhaps this is a stable article. If for no other reason, this is a notable product and article because of its design award. -- Sy / (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Deprodded, coverage found
In addition to the brief TIME coverage linked in the article already, I found the following: Google News found a few articles (San Antonio Express News, Orlando Sentinel), but Google Books found a lot more .--Michig (talk) 07:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)