Talk:Head House Square

Merger proposal
I propose that New Market and Head House be merged into Head House Square. I think that the content in the New Market and Head House article is excellent but can easily be explained in the context of Head House Square, and the Head House Square article is of a reasonable size that the merging of New Market and Head House will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Furthermore, the name Head House Square more accurately and concisely describes the topics discussed in the New Market and Head House article. PHILA19106 (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that the merger should go the other way, since the building is an historic landmark, and the square doesn;t seems to have a lot additional to be said about it. Merger in that direction would be much easier. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I have no strong feeling one way or another, as long as the national significance of the landmark designation is maintained.  Magic ♪piano 19:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)