Talk:Headless content management system

Addition of example
Header added for new topic. GermanJoe (talk) 11:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@GermanJoe Please visit the Wiki page for "Soft Drinks" within which you will find a list of producers of soft drinks. Providing examples of incidences of an article's topic has *very obvious* context. Nor, is the objective description of services against protocol, as you said yourself. I had no roll in the development of this openly available open-source project.

Opensource708 (talk) 11:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * , compiling a list of all Wiki-notable products (which should have a sourced Wikipedia article first) for a defined list criterion would be OK. Compiling a list of all noteworthy products based on independent reliable sources would also be OK. But singling out one specific "example" to advertise a product without any independent source is not OK. GermanJoe (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

HI GermanJoe. All understood. I'm not particularly familiar with any other head-less CMS systems, more background reading to be done! It looks like the sourced Wikipedia article for superdesk has been removed (a dead Link is still shown on their organisations page). Heyho, I'll set a calendar date for a few weeks and see if anything has changed! 178.19.218.35 (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Ease of use for authors is pretty subjective. Headless CMS platforms, in general, have not been all that great for content authors who are trying to manage anything beyond simple content. Basic content forms with no preview capability is a major drag from content authors. Organizations want the omni-channel capability of headless, the content first perspective and the development advantages but authors still want all the tools they have become accustomed to over the past 15 years. In-context preview, editing, drag and drop, targeting support just to name a few. Headless CMS platforms without support for these slow authors down in real-world use cases.

The neutrality here is an absolute mess.
This page is like an advertisement and uses external links to advertising sites. Anyone up for a total reform of this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phantasm99 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm trying it. This page is like my fucking albatross. There's so much to fix. --FeldBum (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Removal of advertisement content
What do you guys suggest?

Dsalinasgardon (talk) 13:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)