Talk:Headquarters of the United Nations/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Shenhemu (talk) 11:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

This article was nominated GA in 2009, see Talk:United Nations Headquarters/GA1, but failed. Main reason was a lack of historical info, beginning and completion dates, organizations using it, etc. All that information has been added later.

The text and design now look good to me at first glance, but a few dead external links need to be fixed. One link to ABC News (Ref 31) has been dead since 2007...

-- Shenhemu (talk) 12:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Seeing that the majority of references don't use cite web, and even worse, the majority of the article is unreferenced.... This article does for sure fail the GA criteria! + Its the UN headquarter, the article can be made much bigger. --TIAYN (talk) 20:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have removed the dead links and added additional refs. Racepacket (talk) 15:20, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I even removed the ABC News link. We are now at 40 footnoted sources.  I think that the article deserves a GA, but would like to hear from Shenhemu. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

I think most of TIAYN's concerns have been solved with the latest quality improvements by Racepacket. I don't think the article should be much bigger, since this is only about the headquarter, not about the UN itself. Still, I suggest to add some more cross-refences to other major UN articles, where possible. Be waiting with final GA listing. Shenhemu (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Good article now! Thanks to Racepacket and all other contributors! Shenhemu (talk) 07:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)