Talk:Health Consumer Powerhouse

Article is shady at best and should be deleted. Main author's only contributions are about this company and its product. Second author was banned for being a sock puppet. Company is not notable and seems to exist of only two people. Company provides health care comparisons, but doesn't provide information about how it was founded and how it is financed. That's not very trustworthy. It seems to be a marketing ploy, who wrote their own article on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.117.230.8 (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

>I agree, very low quality with questionable citations. 146.198.12.4 (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)