Talk:Health savings account/Archives/2016

Can someone clean this article up?
I don't have the time or knowledge to correct this article, but I'd like to encourage someone who knows what they are doing to do a wholesale revamping of it. It's very disjointed and difficult for someone outside to read. In particular, statements like: "In Indiana, those with HSAs are 98% satisfied." don't belong in the section on "benefits" - they may belong in the section on customer satisfaction, but having glanced at the original source, I think this statement looks like a specific subpopulation within Indiana, and someone who knows more than me should make the judgement about where it belongs. Further, the "Benefits" section is a muddle of "why it's good for society" and "why it's good for an individual" (similarly for criticisms). These should be separated so that an individual making a decision about whether it's good for him/her can get the relevant information. Joelmiller (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 17:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)