Talk:Heart Is Full/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Grabbing for a review. Aoba47 (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Lead and infobox
 * Please include ALT text for the infobox image.
 * For the "jarring reintroduction” quote, either paraphrase it or include the reference in the lead.
 * For this sentence (The single was released on 30 October 2015 through Jackalope Recordings and Atlantic Records.), I would just use “Jackalope” and “Atlantic” to be consistent with the infobox.


 * Background
 * Link Miike Snow on the first use in the body of the article.
 * For this part (Soon thereafter the song became available), please include a comma after “thereafter”.


 * Composition
 * Since this section include information on the song’s lyrics, I would rename the section to “Composition and lyrics”.
 * I am not certain about the use of the audio sample. Usage of non-free media is usually kept at a minimal and only in cases that illustrate the material beyond the prose. I do not see the caption as fully justifying the need for an audio sample. If you change the caption to talk about the song’s composition and its use of the sample, then I would find it useful for a reader as it goes beyond the prose. But, right now, it seems to be there for more decorative purposes than anything else.
 * I added some stuff to the prose and re-wrote the audio sample description. Let me know what you think. Pancake (talk) 21:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Reception
 * I would put the commercial performance of the song into its own paragraph.
 * I would separate the positive reception and the mixed/negative reception into two separate paragraph to make it more approachable to a reader. There is already a natural break around these two sentences (Ben Hogwood of musicOMH called "Heart Is Full" an "excellent" song, praising it for combining the Shaw sample with "broad hip hop beats". Clash writer Luke Winstanley was more critical of the single, writing that it "feels particularly contrived”.).


 * Music video
 * Everything looks good here.


 * Remixes
 * Please include ALT text for the image.
 * This part of the sentence (and was met with positive reviews.) needs a citation.


 * Credits and personnel
 * I would move this sentence (Credits are adapted from the iii liner notes.) to the top of the section.


 * Final comments
 * Wonderful work with this article. I have honestly never heard of this band or the song so I enjoyed reading about this and learning more about different types of music. I will definitely have to listen to more of their music. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to promote this to a GA. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe the issues have been addressed now :) And thank you! I recommend you listen to them, they're quite an interesting trio. They've tried on a lot of different sounds throughout their three albums. Pancake (talk) 21:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Verdict
 * Thank you for addressing everything! I will ✅ this. Aoba47 (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)