Talk:Heathenry (new religious movement)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ThorLives (talk · contribs) 07:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

I have made many complaints on the talk page, but the main problem is neutrality. The article, as presently constituted, draws almost exclusively from the work of left-wing Norse pagans, many (like Dr. Snook) have been expelled from mainline groups such as the Asatru Folk Assembly. I attached a tag challenging the neutrality of the article, but it was deleted by the same person who rewrote the entire article and then nominated the piece as a "good article."

The present article also contains many errors of fact. I would correct them, but my edits on this article have all been deleted by the person who rewrote it. Example: the word for one of the souls is typically hugr--not hugh. (Norse pagans use Old Norse terms)

--ThorLives (talk) 07:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * As has already been said at GAN1, you are simply unsuitable to conduct this review. By commenting on the GAN2 page you have initiated yourself as the reviewer. In frustration, I will re-nominate the article for a third time. Do not comment on it, thus initiating the review, this time. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)