Talk:Heather Boushey/Archive 1

Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 00:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 17:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Revert
I just reverted 's edit because I think an event that was reported in Bloomberg News and Politico deserves a space in this article. The amount or slant of coverage may be WP:UNDUE atm, but I don't think the solution is to remove it entirely. What do others think? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Support. Those are two reputable sources. Both are green on WP:RSP. Coverage of this should not really be in the lead paragraph (one IP tried to add a giant paragraph up there), but it does deserve a small section down where it's at currently, with care to maintain WP:NPOV. – Novem Linguae (talk) 20:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

What is the rationale for including a disgruntled employee’s unverified allegations about why she was fired? This is current events, not encyclopedic. If you want to address it, maybe deal with the employer’s claim that Boushey was not this employee’s supervisor, and that the employee was fired for skipping meetings, making racist comments, and drinking on the job?Verklempt (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * But ummmm, how about removing the TWITTER reference from Boushey's organization that smear's a whistleblower. What ever happened to believing whistleblowers and protecting them? Bloomberg is okay as a source, but Politico is obviously a biased source.Scottca075 (talk) 02:13, 4 December 2020 (UTC)