Talk:Hebron Church (Intermont, West Virginia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 00:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

 I will start a comprehensive review this article. Thanks, --Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Infobox

 * Citations are unecessary.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * and, thank you for your review of this article! I've removed the inline citation from the date in the template, but because the NRHP number is not in the article, I've kept the inline citation next to it, as is standard with NRHP property articles on Wikipedia. Thank you for the suggestion! -- West Virginian   (talk)  08:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Body

 * 4 citations for one point seems too much
 * and, I've whittled these down to one citation. -- West Virginian   (talk)  08:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Duplicate link to "Wardensville"
 * and, I've delinked Wardensville. -- West Virginian   (talk)  08:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * It is unecessary to put cites like this: "The sun is hot.[1] The sun is red.[1]"
 * and, I've removed many of the duplicate inline citations. Please take a look and let me know if you have any other comments or questions. Thanks! -- West Virginian   (talk)  08:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)