Talk:Heckle and Jeckle

FYI
The section is full of unsourced trivial information that in list form and is not vital to the article existence. So it must be removed to help improve the article as a whole.

The caption is not redundant, it help to be descriptive to it's point while not causing the image to a mere garnish. Sarujo (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The section clearly shows that H&J retain relevance in popular culture. You may tag it for the time being, but deleting it entirely is not helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Rackinfrackin (talk • contribs) 19:36, 22 February 2012


 * No, all the section does is list trivia that makes bold claims without anything to back it up. When you are making an article, you must always verify everything with reliable sources. Otherwise it has no real place in the article. Lets not forget that it's in list form.


 * Also, Rackinfrackin when you post a comment, please take the time to sign your name with " ~ ". Sarujo (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

which bird?
Raven or magpies? I always though they were ravens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:CDCE:EA01:8699:2FB5 (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Who's who?
Except for the last sentence, which lists voice actors (and doesn't belong in the section or the paragraph), the entire Who's Who section is original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)