Talk:Hedonic hunger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs)

Obvious/major mistakes/errors
There are no large mistakes/errors. There are no or  tags, etc.

Spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization
This article is well-written and does not contain any spelling, grammar, punctuation or capitalization issues.

Article content: plagiarism, content/comprehensiveness and image use policies
There is no plagiarism and the images are correctly licensed. The content broadly covers the subject but doesn't go into great detail except where needed.

Stability and point of view
This article is very stable, with no edit wars in all of its history, and is written from a neutral point of view. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01

Overview in all
This article is stable, well-referenced, and in general perfect to be a good article. The lead is very short and summarizing, and the article is informative, accessible, of a reasonable length and understandable to everybody. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01