Talk:Heilpraktiker

Better before?
Is the article as it currently stands an improvement over the stub that existed yesterday. I realise that it is a translation from Deutch, but it is so badly structured and referenced that the stub was better. -Roxy, the dog. Esq . wooF 16:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have twice returned this article to the stub that was in place before the German article "translation" was substituted for the stub. I make no comment about the quality of the translation work, but the resultant article does not meet tha standards of an enwiki article as the sourcing is very poor.
 * Please do not put that awful article back. Thanks. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 18:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I haven't looked into this, just translated a bit of history, because the idea promoted in what I saw yesterday. that the whole profession and even the name is a Nazi invention, is plain wrong. More to come, and sources, but need a break. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)