Talk:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation

See also Tilton v. Richardson
I would've placed a see also section on the article page with a link to the Tilton v. Richardson case where the Court refused to allow taxpayer standing under the Free Exercise Clause, but there is no wiki-article for that case yet.
 * --Wowaconia 04:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Appeals court
... has the following quote: "'Taxpayers have standing to challenge an executive-branch program, alleged to promote religion, that is financed by a congressional appropriation, even if the program was created entirely within the executive branch, as by Presidential executive order,' as long as the actions of the Executive Branch officials are financed by general appropriations."

I'm seeing two problems with that. 1) Why is there an apostrophe after "order,"? 2) When I followed the reference link to check the original quote it wasn't there. That means the quote, the source, or both are incorrect. Does anyone have an actual source link? --Kitsunegami (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)