Talk:Helen L. Smits

really really great work so far with this. Honestly my biggest question mark is using her own words might be a red flag. Are there other publications that you can cite so that you don't have to cite her? This especially in sections not marked "research" but possibly also there (and you're missing a citation at the end there) --- basically we want to think about the bias question for this -- it's less likely to be biased if it's coming from someone else and therefore more likely accurate. When you're representing her research it's more straightforward and contained bc it's her research you're talking about so it makes sense to quote it at least a little. Also the lead should give us a bit more. It's OK if there's some repetition farther down. encyclopedic writing should keep in mind the fast reader and skimmer - how can you condense all the most important bits into the lead? At least her job titles... --Liliput000 (talk) 02:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2021 and 26 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eb5406a, Jada.barrett, Isabellahinds. Peer reviewers: Taylormapstone, KhushiRamnani, Nicolecmerhi, Jt5826a.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hey! I have added it to the peer review article so it should be available now! I was really impressed with your efforts and writing, look forward to reading your finalized version!