Talk:Helical scan

Diagram need


This really needs a diagram. — Omegatron 16:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You would think it would be easy to find patent images, but navigating their site is a pain. I've found a few that would be useful, though? — Omegatron 18:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

If somebody would like to create a diagram, here's a good starting point for a re-creation:. Peter S. 19:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

There's also a few I found that show the azimuthal separation thing, but I don't know which ones are most typical for, say, VHS. I think the ones I found are some proprietary format with six bands per frame or something. Anyway, recreated images would be better than patent images with dimension markings and everything.

An animation would be even better. :-) — Omegatron 19:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * OK I draw a very simple diagram. One more thing. Could someone please draw a simple arrow on a copy of this photo to point out the plane of head tilt in azimuth recording. The text-based description is not clear too me. --Kubanczyk 22:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Helical scan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709013623/http://www.dcvideo.com/obsolete-video-formats/2-inch-ampex-vr-660.html to http://dcvideo.com/obsolete-video-formats/2-inch-ampex-vr-660.html
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130116131450/http://columbiaisa.50megs.com/camcord_formats_history.htm to http://columbiaisa.50megs.com/camcord_formats_history.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709013623/http://www.dcvideo.com/obsolete-video-formats/2-inch-ampex-vr-660.html to http://dcvideo.com/obsolete-video-formats/2-inch-ampex-vr-660.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Uncited material in need of citations
I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Theory of operation
In a fixed tape head recording system, magnetic tape is drawn past the head at a constant speed. The head creates a fluctuating magnetic field in response to the signal being recorded. Magnetic particles on the tape are forced to line up with the field as they pass the head, thereby carrying with them an imprint of the signal in their magnetic orientation.

The higher the bandwidth of the signal being recorded, the faster the tape must be drawn past the head. If high frequency signals are recorded on tape that moves too slowly, the polarity of the magnetic particles can oscillate in the vicinity of the head, leaving them in random positions.

Video needs considerably more bandwidth than audio. To address this, early video tape recorders drew the tape past the heads at very high speeds, which required a lot of tape. For example, the tape in VERA—developed by the BBC between 1952 and 1958—ran at 5.08 m/s, which was good for only about 15 minutes of 405-line monochrome programme recording when using 52 cm reels of tape.

A slower tape speed can be used—requiring less tape—if the head is instead rotated across the tape at high speed so that the head-to-tape velocity is high—for example, a 580 cm/s drum speed with a 3.5 cm/s tape speed. The tape speed and head speed are chosen to ensure that a new area of tape passes the head at each rotation of the drum. To maximize recording area, the tape is drawn past the head at an angle such that each segment of the signal is recorded on a diagonal stripe across the tape. The manner in which the tape wraps around the circular drum at an angle, traveling up like a helix, is from where the helical scan gets its name.

History
When Ampex developed the quadruplex magnetic tape video recording system in 1956, it had certain limitations, perhaps the most important of which was the lack of pause or still frame capability, because the picture signal was segmented, or broken down into discrete segments to be recorded on the tape individually (only 16 lines of the picture in each segment). Thus, when tape motion was stopped, only a single segment of the picture recording was present at the playback heads. The helical-scan system overcame this limitation.

Toshiba introduced helical-scan technology to the television industry in 1959. During the 1960s and 1970s, helical-scan recording machines were introduced by many manufacturers and marketed all over the world. The technology rapidly took over the market for video recording, due to its reduced complexity, greater reliability, lower manufacturing and servicing costs, lighter weight, lower energy consumption, and more versatile features, when compared to the quadruplex system. These factors also made it possible eventually to bring video recording to users at home, in a cassette format.

Practical problems
There were a number of problems to be overcome with this system. The high tape/head speed could lead to rapid wear of both the tape and the head, so both need to be highly polished, and the head made of a hard, wear-resistant material. Most systems operate with an air bearing separating the heads from the surface of the drum. Supplying signals to a rotating head is also problematic: This is usually accomplished by coupling the signal(s) inductively through a rotary transformer. The transport mechanism is also much more complex than a fixed head system, since during loading, the tape must be pulled around a rotating drum containing the head(s). In a VCR for example, the tape must be pulled out of the cassette case and threaded around the drum, and between the capstan and pinch roller. This leads to complex and potentially unreliable mechanics.

Transport systems
Two transport systems evolved in the early video machines, known as the alpha wrap and the omega wrap. In the alpha-wrap machines the tape is wrapped around the head drum for a full 360 degrees (the tape looking like the lowercase Greek letter alpha). There is only one head which writes a complete stripe for every revolution of the head. This system has problems when the head transits from one piece of tape to the next, giving a large signal gap between fields. The machine has to fill this gap with the frame-synchronizing pulses. Such machines are constrained to using guard-band recording (see below).

In the omega-wrap machines, the tape is only wrapped around the head for 180 degrees. Two video heads are required, each writing alternate fields. This system has a much smaller signal gap between fields, but the frame-synchronizing pulses are able to be recorded on the tape. Cassette-based systems can only utilize the omega-wrap technique, since it is impractical for an automatic loading system to introduce a loop into the tape. Early omega-wrap systems utilize guard-band recording, but the presence of two heads permits the development of the slant-azimuth technique. Later developments use increasing numbers of heads to record video using smaller drums and for recording HiFi sound as well.

A variation of the omega wrap, such as that used by Echo Science Corporation of Mountain View, California in its instrumentation and high resolution video recorders in the late 1970s and 1980s, wraps the 1-inch tape about 190 degrees around the two-headed drum, so there is signal overlap between the two heads. Head switching in video recorders occurs instantaneously in the video models, during a horizontal sync interval. With a standard NTSC video signal a head can cover one sixth of a field each time it passed across the tape. Switching in instrumentation models is gradual, so the signals from both heads overlaps briefly, producing a transient-free output signal where the original signal does not contain convenient dead intervals during which a switching transient can be hidden.

Slant-azimuth recording
Every videotape system attempts to pack as much video as possible onto a given-sized tape, but information from one recording stripe (pass of the video head) must not interfere with information on adjacent stripes. One method to provide isolation between the stripes is the use of guard bands (unrecorded areas between the stripes), but this wastes valuable tape space. All the early open-reel machines and the first cassette formats, the Philips VCR and the Sony U-matic, use this system.

Later helically scanning recorders instead usually use a method called slant-azimuth recording, also called symmetric phase recording. The head drum usually contains two heads with the magnetic gap of one head slanted slightly leftwards and the magnetic gap of the other head slanted slightly rightwards. (The slant of a magnetic head is referred to as its azimuth adjustment). Because of the alternating slants, each head will not wrongly read the signal recorded by the other head and the stripes can be recorded immediately next to each other, alternating between left slant on one television field and right slant on the next television field. (In practice, it's not uncommon for the recorded stripes to overlap somewhat). Later machines including the JVC VHS and the Sony Betamax use slant-azimuth recording as well as all later machines and their digital derivatives.

Using slant-azimuth recording, the need for guard bands is completely eliminated, allowing more recording to be placed on a given length of tape.

Contrast with quadruplex recording
Helical scanning was a logical progression beyond an earlier system (pioneered by Ampex) known as quadruplex recording, also referred to as transverse recording. In this scheme, the rotating head drum runs essentially perpendicular to a 2 in tape, and the slices recorded across the tape are nearly perpendicular to the tape's motion. U.S. quadruplex systems revolve the head drum at 14,400 revolutions per minute (240 revolutions per second) with four heads on the drum so that each television field is broken into 16 stripes on the tape (which requires appropriately complex head-switching logic). By comparison, the longer stripe recorded by a helical-scan recorder usually contains an entire video field and the two-headed drum spins at the frame rate (half the field rate) of the TV system in use.

Recording an entire field in a single pass allows these machines to play back a viewable still frame when the tape is stopped, and display a viewable image sequence while shuttling forwards or backwards. This greatly facilitates the editing process. The quadruplex systems are unable to display video from tape except while playing at normal speed, unless they have a separate frame buffer.

Confusion with "Slant azimuth".
I see the material on "Slant azimuth" has been removed from the article as of "Revision as of 17:18, 27 July 2022". However, references to "slant azimuth" elsewhere on Wikipedia are being redirected here. That, together with the absence of any description of slant azimuth creates the impression that the term is synonymous with helical scan. However, the two are different techniques that solve different problems.

Not being a regular Wikipedian, I don't know how to fix this except by offering the following explanation:

Helical scan is all about the angle between the head drum and the tape, whereas slant azimuth is about the angle of each head within the drum. Alternate heads are tilted opposite ways relative to the direction of spin, creating a herringbone pattern of alternately tilted magnetic signals on the tape. On playback, each head can only clearly read the signals that are tilted in its matching direction, so the adjacent tracks cannot be read by accident, or cause cross-talk with the intended signal. This allows tracks to be packed closer together than with the older gap-based method of avoiding cross-talk, thereby increasing the recording time for a given length of tape.

I realise the problem with the removed material is the lack of citations, and right now I can't offer any either (I only just noticed the problem! =:o} ). If I turn up any suitable references later I'll come back and report them here.

- Paul Bristow (contactable as: bristow.paul, over at the place known as virginmedia.com) 92.239.225.237 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)