Talk:Heliconius charithonia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Quadell (talk · contribs) 13:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Nominator:

I see that you have nominated this article for GA status as part of a school project. I also see that the only change to the article that you made is to change one sentence and rename one header, and those contributions have since been overwritten.

This article does not meet the Good Article criteria. The lead does not follow Manual of Style/Lead section, in that it has too many paragraphs, it provides information not found in the body, and it fails to adequately summarize the most important facts in the article. There does not contain nearly enough information about some important topics, such as the insect's habitat. The names of headers do not follow our manual of style. The sources do not support all information in the article, especially in the "Migration and Dispersal" section. There are other problems as well.

I'm going to quickfail this nomination. Please do not nominate articles for GA status unless you have substantially contributed to their content, and you believe they fulfill all of the criteria for GA status. – Quadell (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)