Talk:Helium-4/Archive 1

Boson or no?
See Talk:Boson. -- Beland 01:16, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Seems like an error

 * (question copy+pasted from ComplexNuclide2 talk page by SkyLined)

I changed from to  in Helium-4 because it generated

and not the
 * 4
 * rowspan="2"| He
 * 2
 * 2
 * }
 * 2
 * }

that I think is more appropriate. Is this an error or a misuse of the template? ... said: Rursus ( m bork³ ) 12:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 4
 * rowspan="2"| He
 * 2
 * }
 * 2
 * }

compare to helium-3
Interesting... helium-4 is many orders of magnitude more common than helium-3, yet has a much shorter article. Mathwhiz90601 02:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I suggest you go and do something about it :)    — SkyLined (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Occurance of Helium-4
I am confused about the origin of Helium-4 on Earth, the article states In fact, alpha decay of heavy elements is the source of most naturally occurring helium-4 on earth, but I read in the Big-Bang-nucleosynthesis, that most Helium-4 was created in the very early times of the Universe ... 220.142.131.98 (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing here; but it may be true that of all the Helium-4 in the entire universe, most was created in the very beginning of the universe. However, because of alpha decay, a lot more Helium-4 has since been created on earth; this may have created even more than was there from the start.    — SkyLined (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Helium was too light to stay with the Earth during its formation. The giant planets had enough gravity to retain helium and hydrogen. --JWB (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * (it may be worth explaining on the page, hence the request for reference)    — SkyLined (talk) 08:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Why no contents?
Why no "Contents" box for this article? —DIV (120.17.48.70 (talk) 13:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC))