Talk:Helix (database)

Graphical Programming
'Citation required' for the idea that programmers weren't ready for a graphical programming language. Programmers had been using paper-based graphical programming languages since before the introduction of 3rd generation languages, and computer aided graphical programming languages had been a target all that time. (In a generally interesting an informative article) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.182.242 (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Removed that part. The informal tone was not encyclopedic (it seems like several good-faith editors have added their personal opinion in a few sections without a sufficient published source), and such an extraordinary claim would need a high-quality expert source. GermanJoe (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

In the limited section, this article need to find official information to add citations to prove its limitations, and the writing of "while Helix's visual programming is possibly easier for novices to learn..." in this section uses an argumentative narrative instead of Encyclopedia's writing method. Wang Miaofan (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2021