Talk:Hellingly Hospital Railway/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hellingly Hospital Railway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

It's a decent article, but it needs some work before GA. I've put the article on-hold to allow for these issues to be addressed. Cheers, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  13:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I copyedited the article in full, and expanded the lead. Thanks for taking a look! giggy (O) 14:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks to the pair of you... You may be seeing this again fairly soon, as I think it's going to be restructured & rewritten. – iride  scent  15:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)