Talk:Helter Skelter (book)

Untitled
if Brumund-Smith, or anyone else, has a reason to remove that link, feel free to share it. i think it's a point of view worth including. hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.192.108.207 (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Helter Skelter (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070320085827/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansontestimony-w.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/manson/mansontestimony-w.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

"Reception and legacy" section needs to include criticism
The Helter Skelter theory promoted by the book is inherited wisdom at this point but it not universally accepted, and criticism of it should be included in the article. For example, the Manson Family article says: ''Mike McGann, an LAPD investigator on the Tate–LaBianca murders, later said, "Everything in Vince Bugliosi's book (Helter Skelter) is wrong. I was the lead investigator on the case. Bugliosi didn't solve it. Nobody trusted him." '' Bueller 007 (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

In Popular Culture
Hey, there. I thought there would be an In Popular Culture or similar section for this book, and came here to include a reference to it in the 2021 John Lee Hancock Film The Little Things, where the protagonist, while cleaning out a suspected serial killer's apartment, finds and burns a copy of Helter Skelter.

Would including a section like this be a good thing? Leishalynn (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)