Talk:Hendrik Pieter Nicolaas Muller

Assessment
The priority for this article in WPBiography is set at 'low'. I would want to suggest this to be set to 'high', as Muller fulfils the criteria for it. He 'had a large impact in [his] main discipline', namely representing the Orange Free State and the Boer cause in Europe during the Second Boer War. He was known and is remembered for it in The Netherlands, South Africa, and Great Britain, making the second criterium ('Had some impact outside their country of origin') also valid. Michel Doortmont 28 feb 2008 10:08 CET —Preceding comment was added at 09:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Survey
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.


 * Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?


 * Yes please.


 * If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?


 * Academic writing, short (articles) and long texts (books) on history and international relations, lecture notes and presentations, etc., etc.


 * Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?


 * In format and somewhat in style by WikiProject Biography.

At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Will do. Michel Doortmont (talk) 09:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

GA assessment
Makeshift Thackery (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Passed article; Makeshift Thackery seems to have left, and all issues seem addressed. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * All issues except failing citerion 2B, which remains an issue today. – Editør (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Inline citations
This article almost completely lacks inline citations, which is a major issue in regard to retaining its good article status. – Editør (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2015 (UTC)