Talk:Henry Abramson

Why?
He's an important scholar of the Holocaust and Ukranian-Jewish relations. I stupidly wrote the article without capitalizing the "a" of his last name, so if somebody could fix that, it would be great. --Yodamace1 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * thx. --Yodamace1 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

How can I add my bibliography without COI?
Hello-- I've got a long list of scholarly publications, and I'd like to update this article by providing them. I've read the COI guidelines, and I think I am in conformity with them by just providing the references and correcting minor factual inaccuracies. Also, there are a number of peer-reviewed scholarly secondary sources that take issue with my research, and I think including them would be useful as well. Is there anything special I should do before editing? Thanks Ploni Almoni 18:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmabramson (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Abramson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225171736/http://www.touro.edu/tcsouth/faculty.asp to http://www.touro.edu/tcsouth/faculty.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Criticism
Seems petty to list one's person's opinion in a criticism section. There is no one on earth that doesn't have one person who disagrees with them. My understanding is that criticism sections are discouraged and I'd like to see this one go away. 71.220.162.188 (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I removed it since they seemed to be comments only published by that institute's website rather than anything reviewed by peers or having any sort of non-self published editorial capacity. Probably doesn't meet BLP requirements for that reason. Cononsense (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)