Talk:Henry Blodget

Violating terms of settlement?
In what capacity does he "still work in the industry"? Is that meant to imply that he's violating the terms of his settlement? In what way? Mjs 14:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 03:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Blodget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205035725/http://www.thestreet.com/markets/analystrankings/977502.html to http://www.thestreet.com/markets/analystrankings/977502.html

Defamatory commentary; is inaccurate I don't think it is fair to say that Blodget is a "journalist." He is a Wall Street crook with a column. I am removing him from that category.--Mantanmoreland 22:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Crooks can be journalists!John wesley


 * True, but not everyone who writes for magazines is a journalist. Including crooks! I can see Jim Cramer in the journalist category because he has been writing for years and has written several books. But this person is different. Anyway, if the consensus is to keep him in that category I won't object of course, but I think the issue needs to be given some thought. --Mantanmoreland 22:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Incidentally -- separate from this -- I see that there is a "fraudster" category. Question is, not having been convicted, would he belong there?--Mantanmoreland 13:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

contesting claim that Blodget was convicted in a civil trial
This sentence -- from the first paragraph of Henry Blodget's page -- has a factual error: "Due to his violations of securities laws and subsequent civil trial conviction, Blodget is permanently banned from involvement in the securities industry." The matter was resolved by a civil settlement, which The New Yorker, always impeccable and deeply resourced in its fact checking, confirmed: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/04/08/business-outsider MrMarioNateRuizJr (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)