Talk:Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham

Merge with Henry Brooke, 8th Baron Cobham
These articles apparently refer to the same individual. This article should be merged with Henry Brooke, 8th Baron Cobham, which is larger. Why is there confusion about the number? He is the eleventh entry on the list of Barons Cobham. Rbraunwa 16:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, for my part, if there were to be a merge, I'd say that the erroneous "8th" should have whatever can be verified from it merged in here. The fact that its author went to the wrong number implicates her or him somewhat in my view.  Other than some petty vandalism, this one checks out.  Crowbait 17:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

date of death
"24 January 1618 (Old Style)/3 February 1619 (New Style)" and "Cobham, aged and sick, was released from the Tower in 1618, and died a year later" If 3.2.1619 is NS (greg.), then 24.1.*1619* (OS, jul.) may be the right date of death, not 1618. 24.1.2018 by vor400