Talk:Henry Cornelius Burnett/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks great with this article, so I am going to pass it to GA status. Nice work!  Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Everything looks great with this article, so I am going to pass it to GA status. Nice work!  Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything looks great with this article, so I am going to pass it to GA status. Nice work!  Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)