Talk:Henry Fitz

Fitz couldn't be the first
When I read:
 * He was the first American to make refracting telescopes.

I immediately thought of David Rittenhouse - he died before Fitz was born and was a maker of refractor telescopes. Thus Fitz could hardly be the first. I'm sure there are many other American telescope makers that predate Fitz. Perhaps he was the first to specialize in making very large professional telescopes, but he's definitely not the first to make a refractor in the US. --Michael Daly (talk) 20:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I could very well be wrong in the way I wrote that. I am going by this reference on page 395, however it could very well mean very large professional telescopes. Also in the Journal of the Antique Telescope Society, Volume 6, Summer 1994it speaks of Fitz constructing the largest American made refractor on five different occasions. I have reworded the article to very large professional refracting telescopes, which I now believe to be better wording. --Doug Coldwell talk 22:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
This article is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  13:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)  Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  13:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)