Talk:Henry Flitcroft

Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 23:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Whose "B"? is the real question. One wonders in what cultural context an assessment of "low priority" is rendered, doubtless after great consideration. Is the context "European culture since the Renaissance". Or is it "Neo-Palladianism in Great Britain? To be perfectly honest, shouldn't Henry Flitcroft really be rated "uncool"? One wonders, would the flagger here hesitate for a moment before tagging an opinion in an architecture article WP:NPOV?--Wetman 00:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Assuming that your "real question" is just that, my answer would be the steps listed in the "easy steps" above are not complete and this scale. As to priority, I agree that a change is needed.  The guideline I see is High: Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Mid: Important in their discipline.  I will change it to Mid as the article makes no claim to impact outside of his country of origin. Is some further change in order? -- KenWalker | Talk 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)