Talk:Henry T. Nicholas III

Untitled
This sounds like Henry wrote it. 75.81.190.87 (talk) 02:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Vanity page
Started work on fixing this from being a vanity piece and making it more encyclopedic. If anyone has any issues with this, bring it up here before reverting my edits that are well within the guidelines. Cowicide (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the above assessment. A LOT about philanthropy work, but very little about the crazy charges and things in the news. If this censorship of important information continues I suggest a lock on this page as well. 70.231.236.122 (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Scandal
I think either Henry himself or some of his moogs are trying to quell the scandal here on wikipedia. If the vandal edits keep up, I'm going to recommend a lock on this page for only established editors.

Details of scandal:

source: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0605082nicholas1.html Cowicide (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This page needs to be locked --64.231.180.103 (talk) 05:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

A public forum is not a place to vent your obvious issues. Whatever problems you have, tend to them elsewhere. Obviously Dr. Nicholas has friends that are going to look out for him. Not "moogs." I won't have this negativity anywhere I can see it. I have no issues with the news covering these issues. They do so in a manner that is professional albeit it still is bothersome but it is still considered newsworthy. Please try to do the same and handle it in a professional manner if you wish to have what you write kept up. What you said was slanderous and stated as if it were fact. It is alleged at best and not fact. I don't care who you are. To put down any person the way you did says you have nothing better to do with your time than to bury another. He has done enough positive things to last a lifetime and the link says enough to cover any "facts" you wish to portray. Therefore, to allow the "evidence" of your claims I have given you the benefit of leaving the link there for your source. Try writing with a little class next time and less crass. that might help. The writing you left seemed more like an angry vendetta to anyone that read it. What you say about others says more about YOU than it does about them. I hope you can move on from that. It will free you to live. Working to hurt others is negative energy. If you focus on positively helping yourself it will be much better. Best of luck. Whatever happened, leave it be. It's done. Blessings.

Criminal justice and politics
The part about UC Davis lawschool filing an action in opposition to Marsy's Law is not really about Nicholas but as there is not a seperate article about it, I thought it appropriate to put it here. How does one get an invitation to the cave? (just kidding) Mike Hayes (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)