Talk:Henry Taube/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 04:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * Fixed the dab links, actually none of those were the correct William Bray, so I removed the link. I will check later to see if he is perhaps notable and then re-add if needed.  Canada Hky (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Agreed, and moved.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Please delete "Professor" from the first sentence. MOS
 * Done.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Can you provide more details on what is missing for this one? Thanks!
 * - instead of Amazon cite for book. The rest check out. Thanks,
 * Can't believe I spaced on that. Thank you.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Corrected, thank you.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed most of the issues, and added some additional information to make the article better.  I appreciate your time, and let me know if there is anything else I need to work on.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Finished up a few more issues. Thanks!  Canada Hky (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment from stone.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed most of the issues, and added some additional information to make the article better.  I appreciate your time, and let me know if there is anything else I need to work on.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Finished up a few more issues. Thanks!  Canada Hky (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment from stone.
 * Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed most of the issues, and added some additional information to make the article better.  I appreciate your time, and let me know if there is anything else I need to work on.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Finished up a few more issues. Thanks!  Canada Hky (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment from stone.

Nice work and good to read, it is a sad that not all noble laureates find a friend helping them though GAN.

One question: The name and the fact that he spoke lower German as first language may puzzle people not familiar with the fact that at several points in history German settlers went east on the invitation of the rulers in Hungary, Russia .... Might be good to point this out some way. -- Stone (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the honorary degree from SUNY Stony Brook and added a ref. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 01:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

In the intro, he is said to be the only "Saskatchewanian-born" Nobel Laureate. Should read "Saskatchewan-born", shouldn't it? 2001:569:FC6B:6D00:59ED:3C27:DF58:C157 (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Rick E