Talk:Henry de Lichton

GA Review
1. Well written. Clear prose and layout. ✅

2. Accurate and verifiable. Footnotes from reliable sources. ✅

3. Broad. Major topics are covered with no unnecessary details. ✅

4. Neutral. ✅

5. Stable. ✅

6. Images. Appropriate with fair use rationale. ✅

Well done. Years w/o dates should be de-wiki-ed. I will do this. -- SECisek 01:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)