Talk:Her Story (video game)

Synopsis Is Wrong
Hannah has a split personality, not a twin sister named Eve.--Valkyrie Red (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No, she definitively has a twin sister. In the game the police uncover various pieces of physical evidence such as three sets of fingerprints in the bedroom, or Eve getting a speeding ticket while Hannah is at work, the tattoo, the bruise, Hannah calling Simon in Oxford from their home phone while Simon is with Eve having a romantic weekend. 2600:6C5C:6100:2A3E:3DEE:FDB7:98:E7CD (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Belated, but I agree with this. While *usually* editors talking about the "true meaning" of games or their endings is super-suspicious, this is a rare case where the plot synopsis is just misleading.  If nothing else, it should be made more clear that there are multiple interpretations of what "actually" happened, and that the one being discussed is the "naive" one that basically believes everything "Eve" says in the later interviews.  However, the developer clearly wanted you to at least consider that Hannah could A) Actually have a twin sister that people were strangely oblivious of, B) be lying in some sort of failed Hannibal Lecter / Kaiser Soze attempt to confuse the police, or C) is actually crazy and has an alter-ego personality.  They all have problems, but I think the developer wanted players to at least consider them.  SnowFire (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * After all, it makes more sense if they're twins or at least they really believe that, because otherwise the (Eve's) alibi is none. --Ghettobuoy (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

The "Plot" section claims "It is not entirely clear if Eve's story of being an identical twin is true, an intentional fabrication meant to confuse the police, or a case of split personality.", but this is false, there is ample evidence in the game that the police is talking to two identical twins pretending to be the same person. References to outside authors claiming that "it's not clear" mean nothing, these authors are simply wrong. Example of the evidence: the bruise coming and going depending on the day of the interview. One day there's a bruise, then there isn't one, then the bruise is back. 2A02:A03F:6A44:C500:211C:4193:119:AB9D (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Coming to any of these conclusions ourselves is original research. We're more interested in what the sources are saying. – Rhain  ☔ 00:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)